In itself a contentious category, 'theoretical humanities' represents the productive nexus of work in the disciplinary fields of literary criticism and theory, philosophy, and cultural studies. The journal is dedicated to the refreshing of intellectual coordinates, and to the challenging and vivifying process of re-thinking. It welcomes particularly articles on the relationships among the new literatures and between the new and the established literatures. The journal features critical inquiry that cuts across academic boundaries to focus on social, political, and cultural practices from the standpoint of communication.
Martin van Creveld Clausewitz was wrong!
As so often happens, I skimmed this book and put it aside last fall when it was assigned reading. More recently I picked it up and became fascinated with it.
Van Creveld is an Israeli historian, so he has seen more war than most academics. He is always interesting, though not always right.
He says that serious peace negotiations were underway in Moscow in the days before Little Boy obliterated Hiroshima.
Here are my notes on what van Creveld has to say: We are entering an era Of unconventional forms of warfare: Rather, it is WARRE in the elemental, Hobbesian sense of the word, by far the most important form of armed conflict in our time.
Of World War II: Historically Tranformation of war review, in fact, trinitarian war--in other words, a war of state against state and army against army--is a comparatively recent phenomenon; hence, the things that the future has in store for humanity may also be very different indeed.
The same applies to the weapons that it employes, the methods that it uses, and even the reasons it is waged. It will have to weaken its forces at one point and reinforce at another The greater the risk that a force takes, the more likely it is to succeed but the worse also the consequences if it does not.
The opponent, however, is assumed to be intelligent and active Even if we substitute "rulers" for "state," the view does not date further back than the Renaissance. Westerners mostly abandoned religion in favor of more enlightened reasons for slaughtering one another.
However, in the part of the world subscribing to Islam the same thing only happened much later, and then to a much more limited extentJihad as compared to other Islamic duties; however, by and large every free, adult, able-bodied, male Muslim is considered duty-bound to fight and die for the greater glory of Allah Western strategists who are followers of Clausewitz would do well to take this fact into account; or else, failing to understand Holy War, they may well end up as its victims.
However, to say that he does so because he has some kind of posthumous "interest" in the survival even of his nearest and dearest is to invert the meaning of the term It gets underway, not when some people take the lives of others but at the point where they risk their own Just as it makes no sense to ask "why people eat" or "what they sleep for," so fighting in many ways is not a means but an end.
This enthusiasm, in turn, can cause those who engage in it to retain that boyishness; war has always been the business of the young. Already as these lines are being written the fastest growing religion in the world is Islam. While there are many reasons for this, perhaps it would not be so far fetched to say that its very militancy is one reason for its spread Even in the most stable societies, the least they can expect is to have their identity checked and their persons searched at every turn In fact, the opposite is true: While the usefulness of war as a means of gaining practical ends may well be questioned, its ability to entertain, to inspire, and to fascinate has never been in doubt.
War is life written large One very important way in which men can attain joy, freedom, happiness, even delirium and ecstasy, is by not staying home with wife and family, even to the point where, often enough, they are only too happy to give up their nearest and dearest in favor of--war!
Altogether, a splendid book, and one that is even better on the second reading. Buy it at Amazon. In paperback or as a Kindle edition.After 9/11, Kevin Flike MBA ’16 felt a duty to serve the nation.
He joined the Army, became a Green Beret, and overcame combat wounds to attend MIT Sloan. THE TRANSFORMATION OF WAR. By. KIRKUS REVIEW. The intellectual heir of Herman Kahn is alive and thinking the unthinkable in Jerusalem, where he teaches what must be a demanding version of history at Hebrew University.
In appraising the nature and conduct of war (broadly defined here as organized violence) over the years, van . Discuss: God of War () review: We don't deserve this game Sign in to comment. Be respectful, keep it clean and stay on topic. We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read.
Discussion threads can be . The great prison break that can only be described as miraculous: ተባዕን ትክን መውጽኢ ኣይስእኑን The hero’s final push to freedom and justice started with a relocation to the main prison facility in the capital.
Clusterfuck Nation For your reading pleasure Mondays and Fridays Support this blog by visiting Jim’s Patreon Page It begins to look like The USA will litigate itself into Civil War Two with the first battle being half the lawyers in the Department of Justice prosecuting the other half until Anthropogenic Global Warming puts the DC Swamp more».
On August 26, , in an editorial entitled A Glance to the Past A Focus on the Future, The Pencil stated the following. Badme has been the cause of many small conflicts for over three-decades; in it became a flash-point for a major war [with] a colossal human crisis.